Defence Capability & DSAT Consultancy

DSAT, governance and capability — from someone who's served.

Specialist support for the Ministry of Defence, Defence Digital, DE&S, Front Line Commands and prime contractors — covering JSP 822, training governance, Training Needs Analysis, capability frameworks, readiness and learning assurance.

The founder’s experience includes
Royal Navy, 23 years
Ministry of Defence programmes
NATO training
NHS-commissioned healthcare
Social housing
Who I work with

Built for Defence — at the enterprise and the front line.

Ministry of Defence
Defence Digital
DE&S
Front Line Commands
Prime Contractors
Senior leaders reviewing operational plansDefence headquarters — operations centre interiorTraining governance workshop in session
Defence consultancy services

DSAT and capability expertise, applied to your operating environment.

JSP 822 Expertise

Practical, current application of JSP 822 and the Defence Systems Approach to Training — without drowning teams in process.

DSAT Consultancy

End-to-end DSAT support, from analysis and design through to governance and assurance.

Training Needs Analysis

DSAT-compliant TNA that separates real training need from capability, structure and process issues.

Capability Frameworks

Multi-specialisation competency frameworks and skills mapping for assessment and workforce planning.

Training Governance

Audit-ready governance and clear decision rights across providers, sites and the training pipeline.

Readiness Assessment

Evidence-based assessment of whether people, roles and competencies are aligned to operational demand.

Learning Assurance

Assurance that learning is effective, compliant and defensible — supporting the mission, not just the inspection.

Frameworks we use

The thinking we bring to every Defence engagement.

Prelude Method · building on DSAT traceability

The Golden Thread

One unbroken line from business need to business outcome. Read top to bottom, it is a design method; bottom to top, an audit tool. If an activity can’t be traced back to a performance requirement, why is it being done? From the book Training Isn’t Always the Answer.

01Business NeedWhat the organisation needs to achieve or change02Performance OutcomeWhat people need to be doing, differently or better03Role / TaskWhich roles, and which tasks within them04Capability RequirementWhat role holders must be capable of, to standard05Intervention RequirementWhat must change: training, tools, process, resources06Learning RequirementWhere applicable: what people need to learn, find or practise07ObjectiveThe observable performance the learning must produce08AssessmentHow achievement of the objective is checked09Performance MeasureHow change in the real job is checked10Business OutcomeHow the original need is shown to be met
Adapted from Mager & Pipe

The Should We Train? decision tree

One question, two branches, and a decision you can defend. If people could do it under ideal conditions, training will not fix it. From the book Training Isn’t Always the Answer.

Should We Train? decision tree Could the person perform the task to the required standard under ideal conditions? If no, they can’t: there may be a learning need, once information, task design and practice have been checked. If yes, they can but don’t: the cause is in the environment, such as expectations, feedback, obstacles, consequences, leadership or culture. Performance gap identified Could they do it now, to standard, under ideal conditions? NO CAN’T Possible learning need. Check information, task design and practice first YES CAN, BUT DON’T · NOT A LEARNING NEED Expectations · Feedback · Obstacles Consequences · Leadership & culture
Adapted from Gilbert’s Behaviour Engineering Model

The Capability Diagnostic

Eight places to look before you blame the people. Only one is primarily fixed by training, and most real performance problems have causes in two, three or four at once. From the book Training Isn’t Always the Answer.

PERFORMANCE GAP Knowledge & SkillRole & ExpectationsProcess & WorkflowTools & TechnologyResources & CapacityLeadership & ManagementMotivation & IncentivesEnvironment & Culture Primarily fixed by training Usually fixed elsewhere
The Prelude Performance & Capability Cycle

One method, five stages, every engagement.

01

Understand

Agree the outcome, the context and what good performance looks like before anyone discusses solutions.

02

Diagnose

Gather evidence, separate symptoms from causes and test whether the problem is knowledge, skill, process, system, structure or something else.

03

Define

Turn the diagnosis into clear requirements: the performance, behaviours, capabilities and conditions the solution must deliver.

04

Intervene

Choose the interventions that close the gap. Sometimes that is training. Often it is a process, a tool, a role, a decision or a combination.

05

Prove

Measure against the baseline agreed at the start, so the organisation knows what worked and what to do next.

How the approach works

Founder-led Defence experience

Experience across MOD, Royal Navy and NATO programmes.

DS4D

Digital Skills for Defence

DSAT-aligned capability analysis, TNA and learning architecture for Defence-wide digital skills planning.

Capability framework

Defence Capability Framework Design

Consistent competency standards across specialisations, giving one trusted view of readiness.

DSAT TNA

NATO & Royal Navy Training Modernisation

A DSAT-compliant TNA that found where learners were failing, followed by targeted blended learning and coaching.

Cleared and credible

Active SC clearance, senior Royal Navy leadership, and DSAT specialism.

Active SC Clearance
Former DV Holder
Royal Navy Senior Leadership
Former Korn Ferry Consultant
Defence DSAT Specialist
PRINCE2 Practitioner
CMI Leadership & Coaching
L&D operations for around 15,000 colleagues
FAQs

Common questions from Defence programme teams.

Current. DSAT and JSP 822 application is ongoing specialist work, not a historic qualification — I keep pace with how the policy is actually being applied and audited today.

Yes — this is exactly what the Senior Information Officer (SIO) Rapid TNA case study demonstrates. Used as a decision-support framework rather than a box-ticking process, DSAT can move fast without losing defensibility.

I hold Active SC clearance and am a former DV holder, and I'm comfortable operating in secure, regulated environments. If your programme needs a different level of vetting, tell me early and we'll work out whether that's achievable.

Either. Prelude can work directly with MOD teams or alongside prime contractors and Front Line Commands on specific capability, TNA and governance workstrands. Jason’s own Defence experience includes 23 years of Royal Navy service and the enterprise-wide Digital Skills for Defence programme, delivered through Korn Ferry.

It depends on the problem: a rapid TNA can be delivered in weeks; an enterprise capability framework or DSAT governance rebuild is typically a multi-month engagement. The Capability Readiness Review at the start gives both of us a realistic view before committing to scope.

Need DSAT or capability support?

Tell me what you're facing — JSP 822, governance, TNA or readiness. A practical conversation, no sales pitch.