Senior Information Officer (SIO) Course — Rapid TNA
A Senior Information Officer course needed analysis at pace — but the team feared that moving quickly would mean cutting DSAT corners and losing defensibility.
Why it mattered
Many believe Defence change is slow because of DSAT. In reality, DSAT is often treated as a process to complete rather than a framework to support decision-making — and that, not governance itself, is what slows things down.
What I did, and what it delivered.
Approach
- Conducted a rapid, focused Training Needs Analysis
- Identified immediate improvements that could be actioned at once
- Assessed future role requirements and undertook new role analysis
- Developed policy recommendations from the evidence
- Maintained DSAT defensibility and JSP 822 compliance throughout
Deliverables
- A rapid TNA report with immediate and future-state findings
- New role analysis for future requirements
- Policy recommendations backed by evidence
- A defensible DSAT/JSP 822 compliance trail, produced at pace
Results, measured.
- Immediate, actionable improvements identified quickly
- Future role requirements defined with evidence
- Policy recommendations leaders could stand behind
- Full DSAT defensibility and JSP 822 compliance preserved
Avoided the false choice between speed and governance — the organisation got a faster answer without incurring the cost or risk of a later governance failure or audit finding.
Any regulated environment that assumes governance and pace are in conflict can apply the same test: is the framework being used to support decisions, or just to complete a process?
DSAT is a framework to support decisions, not a process to endure. Treated that way, it accelerates good decisions rather than delaying them.
Recognise this in your organisation?
Let's talk about what it would take to get a similar result for you.